jmoore13
Comments
-
Sounds good - thanks!
-
1) So if there hadn't been a max ceded loss, the Capital Required would have bee 100M*(1-.2) = 80M instead of 85M?
2) If so and the max ceded loss had been 25M, would the capital required have been 75M or 80M?
-
Ah I see - thanks!
-
Also confused on this question - i expected it to be like Fall 2016 #6a where they included it as B*ln(continuous variable) in the linear predictor set equal to ln(u).
-
Thanks!!
-
Yay -inconsistencies in the industry are my favorite lol. Maybe just adding a line in the [Formulas] section (After we click the formulas button on the infinite practice problem) that briefly explains what you said above. I hesitate to vary too…
-
Ahh okay - that all makes sense. Thanks!!
-
Thanks! That makes sense.
-
Hi - can you put that Intrinsic / Extrinisic aliasing are no longer on the syllabus in the BattleCard for this question? I only happened to notice it isn't anywhere in the current GLM paper and came here to see if it wasn't on the syllabus anymo…
-
Thanks! That makes sense.
-
Thanks!!
-
On this same question (2017 #11), would the fact that the standard LR dispersion is equal between the two plans be a reason not to implement it since the proposed plan isn't adjusting much more than the current plan? The 2017 Exam Report only me…
-
Thank you!!
-
Thanks! That makes sense.
-
Thanks!