It's asking you to think about Couret & Venter's multi-dimensional credibility technique in the context of ASOP 12. How does the technique compare against using the standard approach (which is grouping workers' compensation classes into hazard groups) when it comes to credibility, stability of results etc.
Comments
It's asking you to think about Couret & Venter's multi-dimensional credibility technique in the context of ASOP 12. How does the technique compare against using the standard approach (which is grouping workers' compensation classes into hazard groups) when it comes to credibility, stability of results etc.