<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>NCCI.Circular — BattleActs Exam 8 Forum</title>
        <link>https://battleacts8.ca/8/forum/index.php?p=/</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 02:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
        <language>en</language>
            <description>NCCI.Circular — BattleActs Exam 8 Forum</description>
    <atom:link href="https://battleacts8.ca/8/forum/index.php?p=/categories/ncci-circular/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
        <title>NCCI Circular Problem 1 Steps 16-17</title>
        <link>https://battleacts8.ca/8/forum/index.php?p=/discussion/190/ncci-circular-problem-1-steps-16-17</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2023 12:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>NCCI.Circular</category>
        <dc:creator>jmoore13</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">190@/8/forum/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p><p>When selecting the "winning" entry ratios, is it just literally which one is absolute value closest? Or is there a restriction about going over / under?  It didn't seem like there is but wanted to check.</p><p>Thanks!</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>line item 14 &amp; 15</title>
        <link>https://battleacts8.ca/8/forum/index.php?p=/discussion/174/line-item-14-15</link>
        <pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2023 16:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>NCCI.Circular</category>
        <dc:creator>tracyguo8</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">174@/8/forum/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p><p>In Fisher, the balance equations include the tax multiplier when calculating the charge difference and entry ratio difference between min and max premium. </p><p>Why for NCCI Circular, we didn't include tax multiplier when calculating the table of agg loss factors value difference (item 14) and entry difference (item 15)?</p><p>Thanks.</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>NCCI Circular</title>
        <link>https://battleacts8.ca/8/forum/index.php?p=/discussion/114/ncci-circular</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2022 03:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>NCCI.Circular</category>
        <dc:creator>xuchaofan8</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">114@/8/forum/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p><p>The reason why there is no old exams for this paper, is that because it is a new paper? Is it very different to the old NCCI retrospective rating plan?</p><p>Thanks,</p><p>CFX</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Practice problem - excess loss premium</title>
        <link>https://battleacts8.ca/8/forum/index.php?p=/discussion/110/practice-problem-excess-loss-premium</link>
        <pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2022 23:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>NCCI.Circular</category>
        <dc:creator>tracyguo8</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">110@/8/forum/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>In the practice problem(pdf/excel), we are asked to calculated basic perm factor.</p><p>If the question also asks for excess loss premium, is it (unlimited loss -limited loss)* loss conversion factor c?</p><p>Thanks,</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>2018.Fall #14 - Table Values</title>
        <link>https://battleacts8.ca/8/forum/index.php?p=/discussion/67/2018-fall-14-table-values</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 17:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>NCCI.Circular</category>
        <dc:creator>ph2warne</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">67@/8/forum/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>Your excel version of the exam pre-populated the table values for the max/min ELF's; they were not given on the real exam.  Just want to double check if this is a case where the tables we would have needed here were not provided in this year's study kit.  To use Appendix B, we need to use Expected Claim Count and Excess Ratio with Appendix A, but I don't believe we have what we need to do this in this specific problem.</p><p>Am I missing another means of accessing the ELF's with the tables we do have? I realize the specific numbers may have changed (or wrong subtable in our study kit), but want to ensure I'm not missing another path through the tables if they do end up making us manually dig through them for the numbers we need.</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>2018.Fall #14</title>
        <link>https://battleacts8.ca/8/forum/index.php?p=/discussion/65/2018-fall-14</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 01:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>NCCI.Circular</category>
        <dc:creator>tubaguy8</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">65@/8/forum/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>In 2018.Fall #14 (<a href="https://www.battleacts8.ca/8/pdf/Exam_(2018_2-Fall)/(2018_2-Fall)_(14).pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer ugc">https://www.battleacts8.ca/8/pdf/Exam_(2018_2-Fall)/(2018_2-Fall)_(14).pdf</a>), where do they get the values 1.55 and 0.168 in part b? I believe the question is outdated, but I'm just curious.</p><p>One of the solutions:</p><p>Charge(Rg) = (1.65 – 1.55)/(5×0.6) = 0.04</p><p>Savings(Rh) = (0.168 – 0.15)/(5×0.6) = 0.006</p><p>I (experience) = 0.6 × (9,000,000) × (0.04 – 0.006) = 183,600 </p><p><br /></p><p>Thanks!</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Excess Loss Premium and Excess Loss Factor</title>
        <link>https://battleacts8.ca/8/forum/index.php?p=/discussion/60/excess-loss-premium-and-excess-loss-factor</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 22:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>NCCI.Circular</category>
        <dc:creator>mago</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">60@/8/forum/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>Are we not double-counting LAE if the Excess Loss Factor includes an LAE% and the Excess Loss Premium also adds provisions for LAE through the Loss Conversion Factor?</p><p>Excess Loss Factor = Excess Loss Pure Premium factor⋅ELR⋅(1+<strong>Loss Adjustment Expense %</strong>+Loss Assessment %)</p><p>Excess Loss Premium = (Excess Loss Factor)⋅(Standard Premium)⋅(<strong>Loss Conversion Factor</strong>)</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Problem Set 1: W-NCCI-Circular2</title>
        <link>https://battleacts8.ca/8/forum/index.php?p=/discussion/51/problem-set-1-w-ncci-circular2</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2021 20:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>NCCI.Circular</category>
        <dc:creator>ph2warne</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">51@/8/forum/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>We calculate using the Balance Equations: r2 - r1 = 4.01 and phi(r1) - phi(r2) = 0.7993, yet select r1 = 0.16 and r2 = 4.21 with difference = 4.05, and phi(0.16) - phi(4.21) = 0.8064.  Is there a reason for this? </p><p>I had initially chosen r1 = 0.17 and r2 = 4.20, which gives r2-r1=4.03 and phi(4.2)-phi(0.17)=0.7987, which is still not precise but the closest to target among the options given. Am I missing a detail justifying the selection in the solution? I'm not sure I have located the referenced "line-by-line wiki discussion" specifying the details of this secondary example. I understood the first example that was directly discussed in the wiki and source material.</p><p>Thank you.</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
